La Representacion De Asia En Las Letras Modernas Hispanoamericanas.

Resumen del Libro

This project analyses the various ways in which representation of space has been used to construct Asia, especially China and Japan, by nineteenth-and twentieth-century Spanish-American writers. I approach this study with an understanding of space as a social construct delineated by the subjects relationship to the knowledge acquired through readings and real live experiences in Asia. The main authors studied are Jose Marti, Julian del Casal, Ruben Dario, Enrique Gomez Carrillo, Jose Juan Tablada and Efren Rebolledo. My theoretical framework draws from the geographical theories of Michel Foucault, Benedict Anderson and Henri Lefebrve. By reading representations of spaces (spatial practice, representations of space and representational spaces) from various Spanish-American writers through a geographical representation of landscape as a social construction, I respond to the growing interest of scholars such as Julia Kushigian and Araceli Tinajero to study the complexities of Asia as a spatial construction of Hispanic Orientalism and its relation to Asia by Spanish-American writers of the nineteenth- and-twentieth-century. In the first part of this project, I analyze how Spanish-American writers who have not made the trip abroad describe and represent Asia in their writing, especially in short stories, novels and poetry, where they constructed an Asia they imagined and visit yearned. In the second part, I examine the construction of Asia and the representation of the Oriental subjects by the Spanish-American writers who actually traveled to Asia to experience their pre-existing sensations. It is here that I compare and contrast the differences and similarities between the intellectual travelers who did not travel versus the ones who experienced Asia. The writers who visited Asia add a new perspective to the image. The discourse of perceived and lived space described in the chronicles of Enrique Gomez Carrillo, Jose Juan Tablada it is not the same discourse as the…